Page 132 - CA Inter MCQ Book
P. 132

CA RAVI TAORI                                                                                                                    CA INTER AUDIT MCQs
                      (a). Propriety audit
                      (b). Audit against Rules and orders
                      (c). Performance Audit
                      (d). Audit against Provision of funds
                   III.   “While conducting audit against provision of funds, the statutory auditors, M/s Suresh Rana &
                         Associates must check:-
                      (a). That each item of expenditure is covered by a sanction either general or special of a competent
                         authority.
                      (b). That the expenditure incurred has been on the purpose for which the grant and appropriation
                         has been provided and the amount of expenditure does not exceed the appropriation made.
                      (c). That the expenditure conforms to the relevant provision of the constitution.
                      (d). That the expenditure is in accordance with the financial rules, regulations and orders issued by
                         the competent authority.
                   IV.   “Which  part  of  expenditure  audit  covers  the  scrutiny  of  the  expenditure  incurred  on  the
                         construction of stockyard by the company which is considered as infructuous and avoidable by
                         CA Suresh Rana?
                      (a). Propriety Audit
                      (b). Audit against provision of funds
                      (c). Audit of sanctions
                      (d). Performance Audit
                    V.   “While conducting the audit of receipts of HAIL Ltd., which of the following area is to be covered
                         as part of Audit of Receipts?

                         1. Whether all revenues or other debts due to government have been correctly assessed, realised
                         and credited to government account by the designated authorities of HAIL Ltd.

                         2. Whether adequate checks are imposed to ensure the prompt detection and investigation of
                         irregularities,  double refunds, fraudulent or forged refund vouchers or other loss  of  revenue
                         through fraud or wilful omission or negligence to levy or collect taxes or to issue refunds.

                         3.  Whether  the  expenditure  incurred  has  been  on  the  purpose  for  which  the  grant  and
                         appropriation had been provided and that the amount of such expenditure does not exceed the
                         appropriation made.

                         4.  Whether  the  various  schemes/projects  are  executed  and  their  operations  conducted
                         economically and whether they are yielding the results expected of them.
                      (a). Only statement 1 is correct
                      (b). Statements 1 & 2 are correct
                      (c). Statements 1,2,3,4 are correct
                      (d). (Statements 1,2,3 are correct

             46                                                                                       (M21R)
                   RS & Associates have been appointed as the statutory auditors of MNO Ltd. for the Financial Year 2019-
                   20. CA Ramesh is the engagement partner for the assignment. The management of MNO Ltd. has duly
                   given a written representation letter to CA Ramesh regarding acknowledgement of its responsibility for
                   the  implementation  and  operation  of  accounting  system  and  the  internal  control  system  of  the
                   company.  The  management  has  assured  the  audit  firm  that  such  accounting  and  internal  control
                   systems are designed and implemented to prevent and detect any misstatement on account of fraud or

                   error.
                   During  the  course  of  audit,  the  auditor  found  that  the  wages  cost  has  increased  substantially  as
                   compared to the last year. On detailed checking CA Ramesh found that many new workers have been
                   added to the workers list which appear to be dummy workers to CA Ramesh.
                   Further the auditor found that there was a fraud amounting to Rs. 2 crores committed during the year
                   under audit by an officer of the company. Such fraud has already been reported by the Cost Accountant

          www.auditguru.in                                                                                                                                126 | P a g e
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137