Page 86 - CA Final Audit Titanium Full Book. (With Cover Pages)
P. 86

CA Ravi Taori
            • Job Rotation in Sensitive Areas
                   o  Extended periods of performing the same job by an individual can result in complacency and
                      increase the risk of misuse, particularly in sensitive areas.
                   o  Therefore, it is crucial to regularly implement job rotation in key commercial functions to prevent
                      the erosion of controls.
            • Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
               Well-defined Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) play a crucial role
                   o  in defining roles, responsibilities,
                   o  processes, and controls within an organization.
                   o  They effectively communicate operating controls to all individuals involved in a process.
                   o  This ensures that controls are clearly understood and consistently applied, even in situations of
                      employee turnover.
            • Segregation of Job Responsibilities
                   o  A vital aspect of control is to avoid concentration of multiple activities in a single individual for a
                      transaction or decision.
                   o   Segregation of duties is an essential control element that ensures different commercial activities
                      are not carried out by the same person.

         (CNO-MRI.540) Techniques of evaluation of Internal control
         The following are the techniques of evaluation of internal control:
         Questionnaire (Shortcut: ISP Questions Purpose & then Concludes)
         1. Introduction
         Standardization: Auditing firms create standardized internal control questionnaires.
         Objective: Capture all general situations, though not all may apply to every case.
         2. Structure
         Sections: Questionnaire includes separate sections (e.g., purchases, sales, receivables, payables).
         Audience: Intended for company executives responsible for the areas.
         3. Practical Concerns
         Time-consuming: Time-consuming for busy executives to fill out.
         Lack of Clarity: Questions might be unclear to some executives.
         Misplacement: Possibility of losing the questionnaire in transition.
         Solution:  Auditors  often  meet  with  executives  to  fill  the  form  or  fill  it  themselves,  ensuring  executives'
         agreement.
         4. Question Design
         Simplicity: Questions usually seek 'Yes', 'No', or 'Not applicable' answers.
         Weakness Identification: A "No" answer often indicates a control weakness.
         Consistency: Questions should be consistent, sequential, logical, and corroborative.
         Detailing: Some questions may require detailed answers for clarity.
         5. Purpose & Frequency
         Record Keeping: Questionnaire acts as a record for the auditor regarding internal control status.
         First-year Engagement: Issuance is mandatory.
         Subsequent Years: Auditor asks if business or control changes occurred instead of issuing a new questionnaire.
         Third Year: Good practice to issue every third year, regardless of changes, to keep client control conscious.
         6. Conclusion
         Versatility: Questionnaires can be tailored for different aspects of the internal control system.





        www.auditguru.in                                                                                         4.15
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91