Page 148 - CA Inter MCQ Book
P. 148

CA RAVI TAORI                                                                                                                    CA INTER AUDIT MCQs
                         and on receipt of such reply or observations, the auditor shall forward his report and the reply or
                         observations of the Board or the Audit Committee along with his comments (on such reply or
                         observations of the Board or the Audit Committee) to the Central Government within 15 days
                         from the date of receipt of such reply or observations.
                      (c) Report the matter only to the Board since the amount of fraud is not less than 1 crore.
                      (d) Report the matter either to the audit committee constituted under section 177 or the Central
                         Government since the amount of fraud is neither less nor more than 1 crore.
                    IV.  Sub-rule (4) of Rule 13 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules,2014 states that the auditor is
                      required  to  disclose  in  the  Board’s  Report  details  of  each  of  the  fraud  reported  to  the  Audit
                      Committee or the Board under sub-rule (3) during the year. Which of the following details is not
                      required to be disclosed in the Board’s Report
                      (a) Nature of Fraud with description.
                      (b) Parties involved, if remedial action taken.
                      (c) Approximate Amount involved
                      (d) Remedial actions taken.
                    V.  For reporting under clause (xi) of paragraph 3 of Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order,2020, which
                      of the following points the auditor may consider?
                      (a)  Fraud  by  the  company  or  on  the  company  by  its  officers,  employees  or  third  parties  to  be
                         reported.
                      (b) Only suspected frauds shall be included here and not the noticed frauds.
                      (c) Principles of materiality outlined in Standards on Auditing.
                      (d) The auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal.

             58                                                                                 (M22M/N22R)
                   SAM & Company, a Chartered Accountant firm, is in the process of finalising the audit of Health is
                   Wealth Limited which is a Company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Since the past decade, Health
                   is Wealth Limited has made its presence felt in over 10 countries, including India, making it a leader in
                   the global fitness industry. It runs a chain of fitness centres that offers energetic group workouts and
                   multiple workout formats to choose from. It also offers the best equipment, knowledgeable staff and
                   personal advice in a welcoming environment.

                   SAM & Company being a very reputed firm, was appointed for the statutory audit of Health is Wealth
                   Limited. The Engagement Partner CA A and her team of 8 members have conducted the audit in an
                   efficient and effective manner. The senior manager in the team, CA K is of the opinion that they have
                   obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, which concludes that misstatements, individually or in
                   the aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements. One of the article clerks, Mr
                   N, is a fresher and this audit is his first experience as an auditor in a limited company. He is a sharp boy
                   and has grasped all the concepts and techniques very well. However, the term “pervasive” confused
                   him so CA K patiently explained to Mr N the pervasive effects on the financial statements as per the

                   auditor’s judgement. Mr. N understood the term well and thanked CA K for clearing all his doubts.

                   CA  A  disagreed  with  CA  K  that  they  have  obtained  sufficient  appropriate  audit  evidence,  which
                   concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the
                   financial statements. So, the entire team held various meetings and discussions, and finally reached to
                   a  conclusion.  They  concluded  that  they  have  obtained  reasonable  assurance  that  the  financial
                   statements  as  a  whole  are  free  from  material  misstatement,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  That
                   conclusion took into account:

                   (a) Whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence had been obtained;
                   (b) Whether uncorrected misstatements were material, individually or in aggregate;
                   (c) The evaluations.

                   The Auditor’s Report was prepared in writing and it was decided that an unmodified opinion would be
                   expressed. The first section of the auditor’s report included the auditor’s opinion, and had the heading



          www.auditguru.in                                                                                                                                142 | P a g e
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153