Page 108 - CA Inter Audit PARAM
P. 108

CA Ravi Taori
                    Note:  Not  happy  with  answer  given  in  Module.  Checking  any  financial  item  doesn’t  mean  only
                    Reperformance. Reperformance is one of the methods for examination.

                 Factors affecting Sufficiency                Old Course -- (P16M/N17E/M18R/N18M/N20R/N20E/
          QNO    Bhaskar CNO SA500.125                                         M19R/SM20/SM21/M23M/M23R)
          500.07
                                                                                          New Course -- (SM25)
                 The quantity of audit evidence needed is affected by the auditor’s assessment of the risks of misstatement.
                 Auditor’s judgment as to sufficiency may be affected by few factors. Explain
                                                              OR
                 The quantity of audit evidence needed is affected by the auditor’s assessment of the risks of misstatement
                 (the higher the assessed risks, the more audit evidence is likely to be required) and also by the quality of
                 such audit evidence (the higher the quality, the less may be required). Obtaining more audit evidence,
                 however, may not compensate for its poor quality. Analyse and Explain stating clearly the factors affecting
                 the auditor’s judgement as to sufficiency of audit evidence.
                                                              OR
                 What do you mean by the term 'sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence? State various factors that help the
                 auditor to ascertain as to what is sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
                                                              OR
                 General factors which may influence the auditor’s judgment as to what is sufficient and appropriate audit
                 evidence.
                                                              OR
                 State  various  factors  that  help  the  auditor  to  ascertain  as  to  what  is  sufficient  and  appropriate  audit
                 evidence.
          Answer     ➢  Interrelationship Between Quantity & Quality
                            •  The sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence are interrelated.
                            •  The higher the quality, the less quantity may be required. Obtaining more audit evidence,
                                however, may not compensate for its poor quality.

                     ➢  Sufficiency & Factors Affecting Sufficiency (More Evidence from Different Sources and in
                         Bigger Size)
                            •  Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of audit evidence.

                            •  Auditor’s judgment as to sufficiency may be affected by the factors such as:
                                   •  Materiality
                                           o  Meaning of Materiality
                                              Materiality may be defined as the significance of classes of transactions,
                                              account  balances  and  presentation  and  disclosures  to  the  users  of  the
                                              financial statements.

                                           o  Relationship
                                              Less evidence would be required in case assertions are less material to users
                                              of the financial statements. But on the other hand if assertions are more
                                              material to the users of the financial statements, more evidence would be
                                              required.

                                   •  Risk of material misstatement

                                           o  Meaning of RMM
                                              Risk of material misstatement may be defined as the risk that the financial
                                              statements  are  materially  misstated  prior  to  audit.  This  consists  of  two
                                              components described as follows at the assertion level (a) Inherent risk—
                                              The susceptibility of an assertion to a misstatement that could be material
                                              before consideration of any related controls. (b) Control risk—The risk that
                                              a misstatement that could occur in an assertion that could be material will
                                              not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis by the entity’s
                                              internal control.

                                           o  Relationship


          www.auditguru.in                                                                                                                       4.7
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113