Page 398 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 398

It may be noted that, in Client Companies’ offer documents and advertisements regarding
                                 capital issue, name and address of the Chartered Accountant acting as Advisor or Consultant
                                 to  the  Issue  could  be  indicated  under  the  caption  “Advisor/  Consultant  to  the  Issue”.
                                 Further,  such  members  should  not  use  the  designation  of  either  ‘Merchant  Banker’  or
                                 ‘Advisor/Consultant  to  Issue’  in  their  own  letterheads,  visiting  cards,  professional
                                 documents, etc.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case, Mr. SP, a Chartered Accountant, has obtained registration as category IV Merchant
                          banker and acted as advisor to a capital issue of MB Co. Ltd. He has designated himself under the
                          caption “Merchant Banker” in client offer documents and “advisor to issue’ in his own letterheads,
                          visiting cards and professional documents

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Therefore, Mr. SP shall be held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (7) of Part I of First
                          Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

          QNO     First Schedule, Part I,Cl,7 --Designation  Insolvency Professional (IP)  Old Course – (N18R, M19E M22M)
          692.100   TITANIUM CNO – PE.1180                                                   New Course – (SM23)
                  Chartered Accountant in practice, empanelled as an Insolvency Professional (IP) has mentioned the
                  same  on  his  visiting  cards,  letter  heads  and  other  communications  also.  A  person  residing  in  his
                  neighbourhood,  has  filed  a  complaint  for  professional  misconduct  against  the  said  member  for  such
                  mention of IP. You are required to examine the same with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act,
                  1949.
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Laws
                      ▪  Clause (7) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Laws
                      ➢  As per the clause a CA in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he
                             •  advertises his professional attainments or services or
                             •  uses any designation or expressions other than ‘Chartered Accountant” on
                                  o  professional documents,
                                  o  visiting cards,
                                  o  letter heads or
                                  o  sign boards
                          unless it be a degree of a university established by law in India or
                          recognized by the Central Government or
                          a title indicating membership of the ICAI or of any other institution that has been recognized by the
                          Central Government or may be recognized by the council.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In this case, A Chartered Accountant in practice, empanelled as an Insolvency Professional (IP) has
                          mentioned the same on his visiting cards, letter heads and other communications also. A person
                          residing in his neighbourhood, has filed a complaint for professional misconduct against the said
                          member for such mention of IP
                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Here, a Chartered Accountant empanelled as IP (Insolvency Professional) can mention “Insolvency
                          Professional” on his visiting cards, letter heads and other communication, as this is a title recognised
                          by  the  Central  Government  in  terms  of  Clause  7  of  Part  1  of  First  Schedule  to  the  Chartered
                          Accountants Act, 1949. Thus, complaint of neighbour is not enforceable/ valid.


          QNO     First Schedule, Part I,Cl,7 --Professional Achievements (Liasoning)   Old Course – (M12E, PM17)
          693.000   TITANIUM CNO – PE.1180
                  M, a practicing Chartered Accountant sent a letter to another firm of Chartered Accountants, claiming
                  himself to be a pioneer in liasoning with Central Government Ministries and its allied Departments

                  for getting various Government clearances for which he had claimed to have expertise and had given
                  a list of his existing clients and details of his staff etc.
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Laws

          www.auditguru.in                                                           PARAM                                                19.40 | P a g e
   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403