Page 428 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 428

the drawer of the cheque, the drawer of  such cheque shall be deemed to have  committed an
                          offence.
                  Case 1
                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case the cheque was dishonoured with the remark “Insufficient Funds”.

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Therefore,  CA D is liable for misconduct under Clause 2 of Part IV of the First  Schedule of the
                          Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                  Case 2
                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the instant case, CA. Preeto, a CA, had an account with a bank from which she withdrew the
                          amount of ` 2,75,000 and closed the account. This amount of ` 2,75,000 was pertaining to ` 5,000
                          minimum balance and ` 2,70,000 belonging to other account holder and inadvertently credited to
                          his account by the bank.
                  Part IV – Conclusion

                      ➢  The said act of CA. Preeto to withdraw the money which does not belongs to her will bring disrepute
                          to the profession. Hence under this clause the bank can file a suitable complaint under Clause 2 of
                          Part IV of First Schedule of the Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 with the Institute of Chartered
                          Accountants of India.
                  Author’s Note
                  In the first case it is important to mention Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in the answer. Even though it
                  is important to mention this in the answer students don’t mention this and loose marks.

                  First Schedule, Part IV,Cl,2 --Disrepute to Institute   Old Course – (M13E, M16M, PM17, N17M,
          QNO     (Failed to Return Books)                                                             N18M)
          733.000
                  TITANIUM CNO – PE.1440
                  CA. X, a practicing Chartered Accountant, failed to return the books of account and other documents of
                  ABC Ltd. despite many reminders from the company. The company had settled his entire fees dues
                  also.
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Laws
                      ▪  Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

                      ▪  Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Laws
                      ➢  Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                          A member is liable to disciplinary action under section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,
                          if he is found guilty of any professional or “Other Misconduct”.

                      ➢  Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                          As per Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the said Act, a member of the Institute, whether
                          in practice or not, shall be deemed to be guilty of other misconduct, if he,
                             •  In the opinion of the Council, brings disrepute to the profession or the Institute as a result
                                 of his action whether or not related to his professional work.
                             •  Is  held  guilty  by  any  civil  or  criminal  court  for  an  offence  which  is  punishable  with
                                 imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months;

                          A  member  may  be  found  guilty  of  “Other  Misconduct”  as  per  Clause  (2)  under  the  aforesaid
                          provisions rendering himself unfit to be member if he retains the books of account and documents
                          of the client and fails to return these to the client on request without a reasonable cause.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case, CA. X failed to return the books of accounts and other documents of his client
                          without any reasonable cause.

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Therefore, CA X would be held guilty of other misconduct under the aforesaid provisions.



          www.auditguru.in                                                           PARAM                                                19.70 | P a g e
   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433