Page 322 - CA Inter Audit PARAM
P. 322

CA Ravi Taori
                                     Would  be  one  which  has  remained  in  the  (Secured + Unsecured) 25%
                                     substandard  category  for  a  period  of  12  + 100% 40% + 100% 100% +
                                     months.                                100% 100%
                                   Sub-categories:
                                     Doubtful up to 1 Year (D1)   Doubtful 1 to 3
                                     Years (D2)   Doubtful more than 3 Years (D3)
                                   Loss Assets

                       From the above provision, it can be concluded that in case of:

                       AK Industries- It has been classified as Doubtful (D1) category. Therefore, it requires provision of 25% of
                       secured amount. That is provision of Rs 2.50 lakh (i.e 25% of `10 lakh) should be made instead of ₹ 5 lakh.

                       Jupiter  Traders-It  has  been  classified  as  Substandard  asset.  It  requires  provision  of  15%  of  outstanding
                       amount (i.e 15% of ₹ 50 lakhs) which comes to ₹ 7.50 lakh. Therefore, provision made by the branch is
                       correct.

                       VT & Co.- It has been classified as Doubtful (D2) category. It requires provision of 40% of secured amount.
                       That is provision of ₹ 12.00 lakh (40% of ₹ 30 lakhs) should be made instead of ₹ 30 lakh.

                       ASD & Sons- It has been classified as a loss asset which requires provision of 100% of outstanding amount.
                       Therefore, the provision made by the branch is correct.

                       Classification as NPA should be based on the record of recovery. Availability of security or net worth of
                       borrower/guarantor is not to be taken into account for purpose of treating an advance as NPA or otherwise.
                       Hence, these accounts have been classified as NPA on the record of recovery although these are fully secured
                       or guaranteed.

               QNO—     Provision for NPA in Doubtful Category                      New Course – (N23M/M24R)
               BA.09.20  Bhaskar CNO - Unique
                        While verifying provisions of advances of a branch of MCO Bank as part of statutory branch audit, CA Z
                        notices  that  credit  facilities  consisting  of  term  loan  to  KRT  Enterprises  have  been  classified  under
                        doubtful asset (D1) category.

                        The outstanding balance in above term loan account as on 31.3.2023 is ₹ 50 lakhs. Value of security held
                        in account is ₹ 40 lakhs. The branch has made provision of ₹ 7.50 lakhs. Is provision made by branch
                        proper? Discuss.
               Answer   The  provision for  advances  falling in D1  category  is  required @ 25% of  secured portion and  100%  of
                        unsecured portion. Therefore, provision in above case is arrived as under: -
                        Outstanding balance as on 31.3.23                                            ₹ 50 lakhs
                        Less: Value of security                                                                  ₹ 40 lakhs
                        Unsecured portion                                                                        ₹ 10 lakhs
                        Therefore, outstanding balance of ₹ 50 lakhs is secured to the tune of ₹ 40 lakhs and balance ₹ 10 lakhs is
                        unsecured.
                        Provision calculation.
                        25% of secured part         i.e., 25% of ₹ 40 lakhs                      ₹ 10 lakhs
                        100% of unsecured part  i.e.,100% of `10 lakhs                       ₹ 10 lakhs
                        Required provision                                                                        ₹ 20 lakhs
                        Therefore, provision made by branch is not proper. It should have made provision of ₹ 20 lakhs instead of
                        ₹ 7.50 lakhs

               QNO     Special Mention Accounts (SMA)                                      Old Course-- (N22R)
               BA.09.50 Bhaskar CNO -  BA.240
                       CA. Puranjay is appointed as statutory branch auditor of two branches of a nationalized bank for year
                       2021-22. During the course of audit, he came across the following:


                          a.  While verifying advances of one semi-urban branch, he noticed substantial number of accounts
                              categorized  as  SMA  (Special  mention  accounts).  In  this  context,  explain  the  nature  and
                              significance of SMA.
              www.auditguru.in                                                                                                                  10.9
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327