Page 73 - CA Inter Audit PARAM
P. 73

CA Ravi Taori
         Answer     Manual elements vs automated elements in entity’s internal control: Manual elements in internal control
                    may be more suitable in the following circumstances:
                      •   Where judgment and discretion are required.
                      •   Large, unusual or non-recurring transactions.
                      •   Circumstances where errors are difficult to define, anticipate or predict.
                      •   In changing circumstances that require a control response outside the scope of an existing automated
                          control.
                      •    In monitoring the effectiveness of automated controls.

          QNO    Limitations of Internal Control   Old Course -- (P16M /M16M/N16M/N17R/M18M/N18M/N18R/M19R/
          ICS.29  Bhaskar CNO- SA315-P2.360                                                                                      M18E/M19M/M23R)
                 Briefly discuss the limitations of Internal Control.
                                                              OR
                 Internal  control  can  provide  only  reasonable  but  not  absolute  assurance  that  its  objective  relating  to
                 prevention and detection of errors/frauds, safeguarding of assets etc., are achieved.   In view of above,
                 briefly state some of the inherent limitations of Internal Control System.
                                                              OR
                 Internal Control System can provide only reasonable but not absolute assurance that its objective relating
                 to prevention and detection of errors/frauds, safeguarding of assets etc., are achieved. Briefly explain the
                 inherent limitations that the system suffers.
          Answer     ➢  Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance:
                        Internal control, no matter how effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about

                        achieving the entity’s financial reporting objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected by
                        inherent limitations of internal control.
                     Top Management
                     ➢  Judgements by Management:
                        Further, in designing and implementing controls, management may make judgments on the nature
                        and extent of the controls it chooses to implement, and the nature and extent of the risks it chooses
                        to assume.
                     Middle Management
                     ➢  Lack of understanding the purpose:
                        Equally, the operation of a control may not be effective, such as where information produced for the
                        purposes of internal control (for example, an exception report) is not effectively used because the
                        individual responsible for reviewing the information does not understand its purpose or fails to take
                        appropriate action.

                     ➢  Collusion among People:
                        Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people or inappropriate
                        management override of internal control. For example, management may enter into side agreements
                        with customers that alter the terms and conditions of the entity’s standard sales contracts, which may
                        result in improper revenue recognition. Also, edit checks in a software program that are designed to
                        identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.
                     Lower Management
                     ➢  Human judgment in decision-making:
                        Realities that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal
                        control can occur because of human error.
                     Limitations in case of Small Entities:
                                Smaller  entities  often  have  fewer  employees  due  to  which  segregation  of  duties  is  not
                                practicable. However, in a small owner-managed entity, the owner-manager may be able to
                                exercise more effective oversight than in a larger entity. This oversight may compensate for
                                the generally more limited opportunities for segregation of duties.
                                On the other hand, the owner-manager may be more able to override controls because the
                                system of internal control is less structured. This is taken into account by the auditor when
                                identifying the risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
          www.auditguru.in                                                                                         3.28
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78