Page 19 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 19

Responsibility of EP after EQCR & Aspects to be considered by            Old Course – (M22E)
          QNO
          5.005    Engagement Quality Control Reviewer
                   TITANIUM CNO-- SA220.160
                   PQR & Associates, Chartered Accountants, is a partnership firm having 3 partners CA P, CA Q and CA R.
                   PQR & Associates are appointed as Statutory Auditors of ABC Limited, a listed entity for the financial year
                   2021-22 and CA P is appointed as Engagement Partner for the audit of ABC Limited. Before issuing the
                   Audit Report of ABC Limited, CA P asked CA R to perform Engagement Quality Control Review and is of the
                   view that his responsibility will be reduced after review by CA R. Whether the contention of CA P is correct?
                   What are the aspects that need to be considered by CA R while performing Engagement Quality Control
                   Review for audit of financial statements of ABC Limited?
          Answer  As  per  SQC  1,  “Quality  Control  for  Firms  that  Perform  Audit  and  Reviews  of  Historical  Financial
                   Information, and other Assurance and Related Services Engagements”, the review does not reduce the
                   responsibilities of the engagement partner. Hence, contention of CA. P that after engagement quality
                   control review by CA. R, his responsibility will be reduced, is not correct.
                   However, CA. R needs to consider the following aspect while performing Engagement Quality Control
                   Review for audit of financial statements of a listed entity ABC Ltd.:
                   1.  The  engagement  team’s  evaluation  of  the  firm’s  independence  in  relation  to  the  specific
                   engagement.
                   2. Significant risks identified during the engagement and the responses to those risks.
                   3. Judgments made, particularly with respect to materiality and significant risks.
                   4. Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on matters involving differences of opinion or
                   other difficult or contentious matters, and the conclusions arising from those consultations.
                   5. The significance and disposition of corrected and uncorrected misstatements identified during the
                   engagement.
                   6. The matters to be communicated to management and those charged with governance and, where
                   applicable, other parties such as regulatory bodies.
                   7. Whether working papers selected for review reflect the work performed in relation to the significant
                   judgments and support the conclusions reached.
                   8. The appropriateness of the report to be issued.
                   Engagement quality control reviews for engagements other than audits of financial statements of listed
                   entities may, depending on the circumstances, include some or all of these considerations.

          QNO      Date of Signing, Only After Date of Completion of EQCR                   Old Course-(N18M,M19M)
          5.010    TITANIUM CNO -- SA220.160
                   OP & Associates are the statutory auditors of BB Ltd. BB Ltd is a listed company and started its operations
                   5 years back. The field work during the audit of the financial statements of the company for the year ended
                   March 31, 2018 got completed on May 1, 2018. The auditor’s report was dated May 12, 2018. During the

                   documentation review of the engagement, it was observed that the engagement quality control review was
                   completed on May 15, 2018. The engagement partner had completed his reviews in entirety by May 10,
                   2018. Comment.
          Answer  Responsibility of Engagement Partner:
                   As per SA 220, “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements”, the engagement partner shall take
                   responsibility for reviews being performed in accordance with the firm’s review policies and procedures.
                   For audits of financial statements of listed entities, the engagement partner shall:
                       ➢  Determine that an engagement quality control reviewer has been appointed.
                       ➢  Discuss significant matters arising during the audit engagement, including those identified during
                          the engagement quality control review, with the engagement quality control reviewer; and
                       ➢  Not date the auditor’s report until the completion of the engagement quality control review.

                   SA 700, “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements”, requires
                   The auditor’s report to be dated no earlier than the  date  on which the auditor has obtained sufficient
                   appropriate evidence on which to base the auditor’s opinion on the financial statements. In cases of an audit
                   of financial statements of listed entities where the engagement meets the criteria for an engagement quality
                   control review, such a review assists the auditor in determining whether sufficient appropriate evidence has
                   been obtained.

        www.auditguru.in                                                      PARAM                               1.12 | P a g e
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24