Page 373 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 373

Part 2- FIRST SCHEDULE



          QNO     First Schedule, Part I,Cl,1-Working on behalf of CA or CA firm  Old Course – (M19E, M22M, N22E, M23M)
          660.100  TITANIUM CNO – PE.1040
                  CA Sant, a newly qualified professional with certificate of practice, approached CA Pant, the auditor of his
                  father’s company M/s Max Ltd., to allow him to have some practical and professional knowledge and
                  experience in his firm before he can set up his own professional practice. CA Pant allowed him to sit in his
                  office for 6 month and allotted a small chamber with other office infrastructure facility. In the course of
                  his association with CA Pants office, he used to provide tax consultancy independently to the client of
                  the firm and also filed few IT and GST return and represented himself before various tax authorities on
                  behalf of the firm although no documents were signed by him. During his association in CA Pants office
                  he  did  not  get  any  salary  or  share of  profit  or  commission  but  only  re-imbursement  of  usual
                  expenses like conveyance, telephone etc. was made to him. After the end of the agreed period, he was
                  given a lump sum amount of 3,00,000 by CA Pant for his association out of gratitude. Examine the case
                  in the light of code of professional misconduct.
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Standards & Laws
                      ▪  Clause (1) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Standards & Laws
                      ➢  It  states  that  a  chartered  accountant  in  practice  shall  be  deemed  to  be  guilty  of  professional
                          misconduct if he allows any person to practice in his name as a chartered accountant unless such
                          person is also a chartered accountant in practice and is in partnership with or employed by him.

                      ➢  The above clause is intended to safeguard the public against unqualified accountant practicing under
                          the cover of qualified accountants. It ensures that the work of the accountant will be carried out by
                          a Chartered Accountant who may be his partner, or his employee and would work under his control
                          and supervision.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the instant case, CA Pant allowed CA Sant (who is a newly qualified CA professional with COP) to
                          sit in his office for 6 months, and allowed him to provide tax consultancy independently to his firm’s
                          clients, filing of some IT and GST Returns.
                      ➢  He also allowed him to appear before various tax authorities on behalf of his firm. CA Sant was only
                          reimbursed with his usual expenses and was not paid any salary or share of profit for the same.
                      ➢  However, after the end of agreed period he was given a lump-sums of rupees 3,00,000 for his
                          association out of gratitude.

                  Part IV– Conclusion
                      ➢  Thus, in the present case CA. Pant will be held guilty of professional misconduct as per Clause (1) of
                          Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 as he allowed CA Sant to practice in
                          his name as Chartered accountant and CA Sant is neither in partnership nor in employment with CA.
                          Pant.
                  Author’s Note
                  Here it is clearly written that he “did not” get any share in salary or commission. So, no question of Clause
                  (2) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

          QNO    First Schedule, Part I,Cl,1- Brother-in-law practicing on behalf CA     New Course – (SM23)
          660.200 TITANIUM CNO -- PE.1020
                 Mr.  C,  Chartered  Accountant,  in  practice  allowed  his  brother-in-law  Mr.  P  who  is  not  a  Chartered
                 Accountant, to practice in the name of CA. C. He also allowed Mr. T who is employee in his firm to practice
                 in the name. Whether Mr. C is correct in allowing his brother-in-law Mr. P and Mr. T employee of his firm
                 to practice in his name
          Answer  Allowing to Practice in a Chartered Accountant’s name: As per Clause (1) of Part I to the First Schedule to
                 Chartered Accountants’ Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional
                 misconduct if he allows any person to practice in his name as a chartered accountant unless such person is
                 also a chartered accountant in practice and is in partnership with or employed by him.
          www.auditguru.in                                                           PARAM                                                19.15 | P a g e
   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378