Page 382 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 382

Answer  Part I -- Relevant Laws
                      ▪  Clause (11) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Laws
                      ➢  A Chartered Accountant in Practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he engages
                          in any business or occupation other than the profession of Chartered Accountant unless permitted
                          by the Council so to engage.

                          Further,  the  Chartered  Accountants  Regulation,  1988  provides  that  a  Chartered  Accountant  in
                          practice  shall  not  engage  in  any  other  business  or  occupation  other  than  the  profession  of
                          accountancy except with the permission granted in accordance with a resolution of the Council.
                          According to the same, general permission has been granted for authorship of books and articles.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case, CA. Ritu has written a cookery book without obtaining specific or prior approval
                          of the Council.

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  On this context, it may be noted that no specific permission is required to be obtained for authorship
                          of books and articles. Therefore, CA. Ritu would not be held guilty of professional misconduct under
                          Clause (11) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
                  Author’s Note
                      •  Specific permission is required for Editorship of journals other than professional journals. CA
                          Ritu is guilty of professional misconduct under Schedule I Part I Clause 11?
                          o  She is writing a book, you can write book on any topic without any permission, firm
                             name should not be mentioned it’s not editorship, so not guilty

                  First Schedule, Part I,Cl,6 Clarification (Greeting Cards &   Old Course – (PM17, N17R, N18R)
          QNO
          669.000    Invitations)/ Marriage
                  TITANIUM CNO – PE.1140
                  Mr. Raj, a renowned practicing Chartered Accountant, decided to tie his knot with Ms. Anjani. While giving
                  order  for  marriage  invitation  cards,  Mr.  Raj  instructed  to  add  his  designation  “Chartered
                  Accountant” with his name. Later on, the cards were distributed to all his relatives, close friends
                  and clients.

                                                               OR
                  Mr. Swapnil, a renowned practicing Chartered Accountant, decided to tie his knot with Ms. Anjani. While
                  giving  order  for  marriage  invitation  cards,  Mr.  Swapnil  instructed  to  add  his  designation  “Chartered
                  Accountant” with his name. Later, the cards were distributed to all his relatives, close friends and clients.

          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Laws
                      ▪  Clause (6) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Laws

                      ➢  A Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he
                          solicits clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal
                          communication or interview or by any other means.

                          However, the Council of the ICAI is of the view that the designation “Chartered Accountant” as well
                          as  the  name  of  the  firm  may  be  used  in  greeting  cards,  invitations  for  marriages  and  religious
                          ceremonies and any other specified matters, provided that such greeting cards or invitations etc.
                          are sent only to clients, relatives and close friends of the members concerned.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case, Mr. Raj instructed to write designation “Chartered Accountant” on his marriage
                          invitation cards and distributed the same to all his relatives, close friends and clients.

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  On  this  context,  it  may  be  noted  that  the  Council  has  allowed  using  designation  “Chartered
                          Accountant” in invitations for marriages, provided these are sent only to clients, relatives and close
                          friends of the members concerned. Therefore, Mr. Raj would not be held guilty of professional
                          misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
                  Author’s Note:
          www.auditguru.in                                                           PARAM                                                19.24 | P a g e
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387