Page 445 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 445

Answer  Part I -- Relevant Standards & Laws
                      ▪  Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                      ▪  Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Standards & Laws
                      ➢  Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule
                         It  states  that  a  Chartered  Accountant  in  practice  shall  be  deemed  to  be  guilty  of  professional
                         misconduct  if  he  does  not  exercise  due  diligence  or  is  grossly  negligent  in  the  conduct  of  his
                         professional duties.

                      ➢  Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule
                         A  member  of  the  Institute,  whether  in  practice  or  not,  shall  be  deemed  to  be  guilty  of  other
                         misconduct, if he, in the opinion of the Council, brings disrepute to the profession or the Institute
                         as a result of his action whether or not related to his professional work.

                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case, Mr. Brainy, a Chartered Accountant in practice, is grossly negligence in conduct
                         of  his  professional  duties  by  issuing  clean  reports  on the  balance  sheet  without examining  the
                         accounts. Further, he has also brought disrepute to the profession by advising unethical practice to
                         the managing director of the company.

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Therefore,  Mr.  Brainy  will  be  held  guilty  for  professional  and  other  misconduct  under  above
                         mentioned Clauses to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
                  Author’s Note

                  Clause (6) of Part I of Second Schedule can also be referred as over valuation of sales consists a material
                  misstatement, and a clean report has been issued by auditor





          QNO     Second Schedule, Part I, Cl,7 –Audit Report Not Filed Within Time   Old Course-- (M13E, PM17, N17M,
          755.000  TITANIUM CNO – PE.1540                                              SM17, N18R, N19R, N20M)
                  CA  Dev,  a  practicing  Chartered  Accountant,  did  not  complete  his  work  relating  to  the  audit  of  the
                  accounts of a company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company to
                  comply with the statutory requirements
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Standards & Laws
                      ▪  Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
                  Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Standards & Laws
                      ➢  A Chartered Accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he
                         does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.

                         It is a vital clause which unusually gets attracted whenever it is necessary to judge whether the
                         accountant has honestly and reasonably discharged his duties. The expression negligence covers a
                         wide field and extends from the frontiers of fraud to collateral minor negligence.

                         Where a Chartered Accountant had not completed his work relating to the audit of the accounts a
                         company and had not submitted his audit report in due time to enable the company to comply
                         with the  statutory  requirement  in this  regard,  it was  held,  under  a  case,  that  he  was  guilty  of
                         professional misconduct under Clause (7).
                  Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the given case, CA. Dev has not completed his audit work in time and consequently could not
                         submit audit report in due time and consequently, company could not comply with the statutory
                         requirements.

                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Therefore, CA. Dev will be held guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) of Part I of the
                         Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.




          www.auditguru.in                                                    PARAM                                                          19.87 | P a g e
   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450