Page 450 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 450

Part III – Case Discussion
                      ➢  In the instant case, such non-verification happened for two years. It also appears that auditors
                         failed  to  confirm the value  of  investments  from  any  proper  source.  In  case  auditor  has  simply
                         relied on the management’s representation, the auditor has failed to perform his duty.
                  Part IV – Conclusion
                      ➢  Accordingly, Mr. A, will be held liable for professional misconduct under Clauses (2), (7) and (8) of
                         Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

                  Second Schedule, Part I,Cl,9 --Audit of Listed Company                   Old Course-- (M22E)
          QNO
                  Without Peer Review Certificate
          759.500
                  TITANIUM CNO – PE.1540
                  "CA  K  qualified  as  Chartered  Accountant  and  started  practice  as  proprietor  in  the  name  of  M/s  K  &
                  Associates in the year 2015-16. LST Limited, a listed entity, appointed M/s K &  Associates as Statutory
                  Auditor for the year ended 31st March, 2022. CA K signed the  balance sheet of LST Limited for the year

                  ended 31st March, 2022 on 14th May, 2022.  M/s K & Associates never subjected themselves to the Peer
                  Review process of the Institute  since its inception of practice. Comment with reference to the Chartered
                  Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto."
          Answer  Clause (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a Chartered
                  Accountant in practice  shall be deemed to be guilty  of misconduct if he fails to  invite attention to any
                  material departure from the generally accepted procedure of audit applicable to the circumstances.

                   This clause implies that the audit should be performed in accordance with “generally accepted procedure
                  of audit applicable to the circumstances” and if for any reason the auditor has not been able to perform
                  the audit in accordance with such procedure, his report should draw attention to the material departures
                  from such procedures. What constitutes “generally accepted audit procedure” would depend upon the
                  facts  and  circumstances  of  each  case,  but  guidance  is  available  in  general  terms  from  the  various
                  pronouncements  of  the  Institute  is  issued  by  way  of  Engagement  and  Quality  Control  Standards,
                  Statements, General Clarifications, Guidance Notes Technical Guides, Practice Manuals, Studies and Other
                  Papers.

                  Audit of Listed Companies: Pursuant to SEBI Notification, statutory audit of listed companies under the
                  Companies Act, 2013 shall be done by only those auditors who have subjected themselves to the Peer
                  Review process of the Institute, and hold a valid certificate issued by the Peer Review Board of the ICAI.

                   In the given case of M/s. K & Associates, who is appointed auditor of a listed entity LST Limited for the year
                  ended 31.03.2022, CA K, the proprietor signed the balance sheet on 14.05.2022 but never subjected the
                  firm to the Peer Review process of the Institute. CA K would be held guilty of professional misconduct
                  under clause (9) of Part I of Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Also, CA K did not
                  comply with the SEBI Notification which was required to be complied with.

                   Alternative Solution
                  Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 states that a chartered
                  accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of misconduct if he contravenes any of the provisions
                  of this Act or the regulations made thereunder or any guidelines issued by the Council. It requires every
                  member  of  the  institute  to  act  within  the  framework  of  the  Chartered  Accountants  Act,  1949  and  the
                  regulations and guidelines made by Council thereunder.

                  The Statement on Peer Review shall be deemed to be a guideline of the Council under Clause (1) of Part II
                  of  Second  Schedule  to  the  Act  and  it  is  obligatory  for  the  Practice  Unit  to  comply  with  the  provisions
                  contained in this Statement.

                  As  per the  Statement every  Practice  Unit  including  its  branches  who  has  conducted  Statutory  Audit  of
                  Enterprises  whose  equity  or  debt  securities  are  listed  in  India  or  abroad  as  defined  under  SEBI(LODR)
                  regulations, 2015, will be subject to Peer Review in accordance with this statement.

                  Audit of Listed Companies: Pursuant to SEBI Notification, Statutory Audit of Listed Companies under the
                  Companies Act, 2013 shall be done by only those auditors who have subjected themselves to the Peer
                  Review process of the Institute, and hold a valid certificate issued by the Peer Review Board of the ICAI. In
                  the given case of M/s K & Associates, who is appointed auditor of a listed entity LST Limited for the year

          www.auditguru.in                                                    PARAM                                                          19.92 | P a g e
   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455