Page 13 - CA Final Audit Titanium Full Book. (With Cover Pages)
P. 13

CA Ravi Taori
          2B.  HR-Issues:  The  policies  and  procedures  should  address  various  HR  issues,  including  recruitment,
          compensation, training, career development, and performance evaluation.
          2C.  professional  Development:  There  should  be  a  strong  emphasis  on  the  continuous  professional
          development of the firm's personnel.

          (CNO-SQC.260) Responsibilities and Competence of Engagement Partners

          1. Assignment of Engagement Partner: The firm should assign an engagement partner to each engagement,
          ensuring they have the necessary capabilities, authority, and time for the role.
          2. Communication: The identity and role of the engagement partner should be communicated to key client
          personnel and those responsible for governance.
          3. Definition of Responsibilities: Clear and defined responsibilities should be communicated to the partner.
          4.  Competence  and  Skill  of  the  Engagement  Team:  Each  engagement  team  should  possess  the  required
          competence and skill to fulfil their responsibilities effectively. The firm should ensure suitable individuals are
          available and provide training for their role.
          5. Performance Assessment and Quality Commitment: The firm should regularly assess the performance of
          engagement partners and team members, considering their commitment to maintaining quality in their work.
          6.  Quality  Focus  and  Continuous  Improvement:  The  firm  should  establish  policies  and  procedures  to
          maintain  a  quality  focus  throughout  engagements,  including  performance  evaluations  and  measures  for
          continuous improvement.

          (CNO-SQC.280) Engagement Performance

          1. Steps: Engagement teams are briefed (Direction) on their objectives and the processes for complying with
          engagement standards. This includes supervision, training, and performance review methods.
          2.  Consultation:  In  difficult  or  contentious  matters,  consultation  at  the  appropriate  professional  level  is
          necessary. This involves individuals within or outside the firm who have specialized expertise.
          2A.  Appropriate  Person:  Consultation  procedures  require  interaction  with  those  having  appropriate
          knowledge, seniority, and experience on significant technical, ethical, and other matters.
          2B. External Resources: Firms lacking appropriate internal resources may consult externally, utilizing advisory
          services  provided  by  other  firms  or  professional  and  regulatory  bodies.  Documentation  of  issues  and
          consultation results is essential.
          3. Documentation: Proper documentation of the work performed is crucial for maintaining the quality of
          engagement performance.

          (CNO-SQC.300) Engagement quality control review

          1A.  Purpose:  Engagement  quality  control  review  is a  critical part  of  the  audit process, ensuring  significant
          judgments are objectively examined to minimize the risk of issuing an inappropriate report.
          1B. Extent: The complexity of the engagement and the potential risk of an inappropriate report determine the
          extent of the review. More complex and higher-risk engagements require a more comprehensive review.
          2A.  Mandatory:  Engagement  quality  control  review  is  compulsory  for  all  audits  of  financial  statements  of
          listed entities, ensuring a higher level of scrutiny and oversight for publicly traded companies.
          2B.  Criteria:  For  engagements  other  than  audits  of  financial  statements  for  listed  entities,  the  firm  must
          establish criteria.
          to determine which cases necessitate the performance of an engagement quality control review.
          3.  Responsibility:  The  engagement  quality  control  review  does  not  reduce  the  responsibilities  of  the
          engagement partner, who remains accountable for the overall quality and accuracy of the engagement.




          www.auditguru.in                                                                                       1.5
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18