Page 15 - CA Final Audit Titanium Full Book. (With Cover Pages)
P. 15

CA Ravi Taori

          (CNO-SQC.380) Engagement Documentation
          Engagement Completion and Report Handling: The firm should establish policies for engagement teams to
          finalize engagement files promptly, within 60 days after the auditor’s report for audit engagements. If multiple
          reports are issued for the same subject matter, each report should be treated as a separate engagement for final
          file assembly.
          Documentation Security: Policies should ensure the confidentiality, safe storage, integrity, accessibility, and
          retrievability of engagement documentation.
          Documentation  Retention:  Engagement  documentation  should  be  retained  long  enough  to  evaluate  the
          firm’s compliance with its quality control system, or longer if required by law or regulation. Specifically for
          audit engagements, the retention period is typically no less than seven years from the date of the auditor’s
          report, or if later, the date of the group auditor’s report..
          Documentation Ownership: Unless specified by law or regulation, engagement documentation is the firm's
          property.  The  firm  may  share  parts  of  the  documentation  with  clients  without  compromising  the  work's
          validity or the firm's independence.

          (CNO-SQC.400) Monitoring.

          Definition:
          1. System Design & Standard Updates: Ascertain the quality control system's design and effectiveness and
          ensure the reflection of changes in professional, legal, and regulatory standards in the quality control policies.
          2A. Appointment: Appoint a partner or qualified individual to supervise the monitoring process.
          2B. Complaints Management: Handle complaints and allegations about non-compliance with professional or
          regulatory requirements from within or outside the firm.
          2C.  Action  on  Non-compliance  &  Deficiencies:  Implement  corrective  measures  against  personnel  who
          breach quality control policies and take necessary action upon identifying deficiencies in the design, operation
          of quality control policies, or non-compliance with the firm's quality control system.

          (CNO-SQC.420) Complaints and Allegations

          1. Source: Complaints and allegations can originate from personnel, clients, or third parties.
          2. Channels: The firm should provide safe avenues for personnel to voice concerns without fear of retaliation.
          3.  Investigation:  Complaints  and  allegations  should  be  probed  according  to  firm  policies,  under  the
          supervision of a non-engaged, experienced partner. Legal counsel may be involved if needed.
          4. Action: If investigations reveal deficiencies or non-compliance, the firm must take appropriate action.
          5. Documentation: All complaints, allegations, and responses should be recorded.
          6. External Assistance: Small firms can engage external individuals or other firms for investigations.


                                                        SA 220


                        QUALITY CONTROL FOR AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

          (CNO-SA 220.020) Introduction

          1.  Engagement  Partner’s  Role:  According  to  SA-220,  engagement  partners  are  responsible  for  executing
          quality control procedures in audit engagements, ensuring adherence to the firm's quality control system.
          2A. Engagement Team's Role: The engagement teams decide on audit engagement-specific quality control
          policies, in line with the firm's overarching quality control system.
          2B.  Independence  Monitoring:  These  teams  also  provide  crucial  information  to  the  firm  to  facilitate


          www.auditguru.in                                                                                       1.7
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20