Page 343 - CA Inter Audit PARAM
P. 343

CA Ravi Taori

                                       compared to last year)
                                    •  A  significant  change  in  ownership.  (E.g.,  Takeover  from  other  business  group,
                                       pantaloons taken from Biyani to Aditya Birla Group)
                                    •  A recent change of senior management. (E.g., MD / CEO / CFO are replaced)
                                    •  Any  indication  that  the  entity  misunderstands  the  objective  and  scope  of  the
                                       audit. (E.g., They ask for Fraud Report / Compliance Report / Tax Report / Fixed
                                       Asset assessment report etc)

                                Change from Auditors Side:
                                    •  Any  revised  or  special  terms  of  the  audit  engagement.  (E.g.,  Separate  Branch
                                       Auditors / Use of CAAT / Use of Expert etc which are justified)
                                    •  A change in other reporting requirements. (E.g., Reporting on Internal Financial
                                       Control)

                 Change in Terms of                                                         Old Course -- (P16M/
          QNO    Engagement- Master           M17M/M17R/M18R/M18E/N19R/SM20/SM21/M22M/N22R/N22E/N23R)
          210.07  Answer(Theory)
                 Bhaskar CNO SA210.100
                 “The auditor should not agree to a change of engagement where there is no reasonable justification for
                 doing so.” Discuss.
                                                               OR
                 As an auditor, how would you consider the acceptance of a change in audit engagement?
                                                               OR
                 An auditor who before the completion of the engagement is requested to change the engagement to one
                 which provides a lower level of assurance should consider the appropriateness of doing so. Discuss.
                                                               OR
                 An auditor who, before the completion of the engagement, is requested to change the engagement to one
                 which provides a lower level of assurance, should consider the appropriateness of doing so. Explain stating
                 the factors based on which client can request the auditor to change the engagement.
                                                               OR
                 CA P is appointed as an auditor of XYZ Limited for the F.Y. 2021-22. The management of XYZ Limited has
                 requested  the  auditor  to  change  the  terms  of  original  engagement  as  the  company  has  diversified  its
                 business and few new products have been introduced by the company. Can CA P agree to the request made
                 by the management? Under which circumstances can the client make a request to the auditor for a change
                 in the terms of engagement?
          Answer Acceptance of a Change in Engagement:
                   ➢  General Reasons for Change
                      A request from the client for the auditor to change the engagement may result from-
                               a change in circumstances affecting the need for the service
                               (E.g., Change in Law -- IFCR)

                               a restriction on the scope of the engagement, whether imposed by management or caused
                               by circumstances.
                               (E.g., Visit to foreign branches restricted to cut costs or because of war)

                               An  auditor  who,  before  the  completion  of  the  engagement,  is  requested  to  change  the
                               engagement  to  one  which  provides  a  lower  level  of  assurance,  should  consider  the
                               appropriateness of doing so.
                               a misunderstanding as to the nature of an audit or related service originally requested.

                   ➢  Examine reasons
                      The auditor would consider carefully the reason given for the request, particularly the implications of a
                      restriction on the scope of the engagement, especially any legal or contractual implications.
                      The  auditor  shall  not  agree  to  a  change  in  the  terms  of  the  audit  engagement  where  there  is  no
                      reasonable justification for doing so.
                           (E.g. 3 months after appointment company plans to appoint separate branch auditor for some
                           branches,  this  is  change  in  terms  of  engagement  which  said  all  branches  will  be  audited  by
          www.auditguru.in                                                                                                                    11.10
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348