Page 10 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 10

QNO     Consultation with EQCR Reviewer                                         New Course – (SM23)
           127.450  TITANIUM CNO-- SQC.340

                   PQR & Associates are statutory auditors of a listed company. There arose an issue during the course of
                   audit relating to related party transactions. The engagement partner wants to consult engagement quality
                   control reviewer on this matter during the course of audit process itself. Can he consult with engagement
                   quality control reviewer? Discuss.
                   1. SQC 1: Reference to SQC 1, its full name & its requirement have Quality Control System.
                   2. Concept: CNO SQC.340 Who can become Engagement Quality Control Reviewer?
                     Not a Team Member & No Participation:
                     The engagement quality control reviewer should be a qualified external individual, such as a partner or
                     employee who is a member of ICAI, or someone from another firm with a similar background.

                     The reviewer must maintain objectivity and should not participate in the engagement or make decisions
                     for the engagement team.
                     Consultation: The engagement partner can consult the reviewer during the engagement, provided it does
                     not compromise the reviewer's objectivity and eligibility.
                     Substitution:  If  the  consultations  become  significant  and  objectivity  cannot  be  maintained,  another
                     individual within the firm or a qualified external person should be appointed as either the engagement
                     quality control reviewer or the person to be consulted on the engagement.
                     The firm's policies should include provisions for replacing the engagement quality control reviewer if their
                     ability to perform an objective review is compromised.

                   3. Case Discussion: Discuss given case.
                   4. Conclusion: It is necessary to maintain objectivity of reviewer. Participation in engagement or making
                      decisions for the engagement team should be avoided. Engagement partner may consult engagement
                      quality control reviewer during the engagement without compromising objectivity.

                   Examples  of  the  matters  to  be  considered  with  regard  to  the   Old Course – (M19R, N19E)
          QNO
          127.500   integrity of a client by the firm as per the requirements of SQC 1
                   TITANIUM CNO— SQC.160
                   CA M is introduced to a prospective client in a social function. He assures to visit office of CA M very soon
                   in relation to professional work. During discussions over a cup of coffee next week, it transpires that there
                   was a search by Enforcement Directorate in his premises about a month back resulting in recovery of huge
                   sum of cash. The income tax department had also searched his premises in relation to bogus capital gains
                   on  penny  stocks.  Lamenting  poor  quality  of  services  provided  by  his  present  auditor,  he  offers
                   appointment as tax auditor of his five family-owned firms to CA M in lieu of handsome fees. What are the
                   factors to be evaluated by CA M if he wants to take up the engagement?
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Standards & Laws
                       ▪  SQC 1
                   Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Standards & Laws
                       ➢  As per SQC 1, the firm should obtain such information as it considers necessary in the circumstances
                          before accepting an engagement with a new client, when deciding whether to continue an existing
                          engagement, and when considering acceptance of a new engagement with an existing client. Where
                          issues have been identified, and the firm decides to accept or continue the client relationship or a
                          specific engagement, it should document how the issues were resolved.

                          With regard to the integrity of a client, matters that the firm considers include, for example:
                              •  The identity and business reputation of the client’s principal owners, key management,
                                 related parties and those charged with its governance
                              •  The nature of the client’s operations, including its business practices.
                              •  Information concerning the attitude of the client’s principal owners, key management and
                                 those charged with its governance towards such matters as aggressive interpretation of
                                 accounting standards and the internal control environment.
                              •  Whether the client is aggressively concerned with maintaining the firm’s fees as low as
                                 possible

        www.auditguru.in                                                      PARAM                               1.3 | P a g e
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15