Page 220 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 220

However, they later decided to postpone their resignation to the following year. At the conclusion of the
                 audit, there was a difference of opinion between two articled assistants (Jack & Jill), who were assigned
                 to  the  engagement,  concerning  disclosing  the  points  mentioned  above  in  the  Companies  (Auditor's
                 Report) Order 2020. Jack was of the opinion that the proceeding initiated under Benami Property Act
                 need not be disclosed since the expert legal team had informed them that the case would not withstand
                 the law. However, he insisted that the cash loss shall be disclosed along with the amount. Jill was of the
                 opinion that CARO is not at all applicable to the company, hence nothing needs to be reported. They
                 both approached the firm's partners (Mr. Y & Mr. S) to resolve their argument. Mr Y supported Jack's
                 viewpoint & Mr S supported Jill's viewpoint. Now, both partners approached their Senior Partner to get
                 clarification on the same. As a Senior Partner, kindly clarify the correct disclosure requirement

        Answer  As per para 1 of Companies (Auditor's Report) Order 2020, CARO 2020 is applicable to every company,
                 including a foreign company, as defined in clause (42) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, except,

                    (i)  a banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of
                        1949);
                    (ii)  an insurance company as defined under the Insurance Act,1938 (4 of 1938);
                    (iii) a company licensed to operate under section 8 of the Companies Act;
                    (iv) a One Person Company as defined under clause (62) of section 2 of the Companies Act and a small
                        company as defined under clause (85) of section 2 of the Companies Act; and
                    (v)  a private limited company, not being a subsidiary or holding company of a public company, having
                        a paid up capital and reserves and surplus not more than rupees one crore as on the balance sheet
                        date  and  which  does  not  have  total  borrowings  exceeding  rupees  one  crore  from  any  bank  or
                        financial institution at any point of time during the financial year and which does not have a total
                        revenue  as  disclosed  in  Scheduled  III  to  the  Companies  Act,  2013  (including  revenue  from
                        discontinuing operations) exceeding rupees ten crore during the financial year as per the financial
                        statements

                  In the given case, though LIU is a private company, and its paid-up capital is less than  1 crore as on the
                  balance sheet date, it is to be noted that for the period 15th December to  17th December, the total
                  borrowings of the company had exceeded 1 crore (75 lakh + 30 lakh). The borrowings are less than 1
                  crore as of the balance sheet date and the authorised capital is 200 lakh, are irrelevant to the current
                  scenario. Also, the turnover of the company was greater than 40 crore. Hence, CARO 2020 is applicable to
                  LIU Private Limited.

                    (i)  As per clause (i) (e) of para 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor shall include a statement on: whether any
                        proceedings have been initiated or pending against the company for holding any benami property
                        under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988  (45 of 1988) and rules made thereunder, if
                        so, whether the company has appropriately disclosed the details in its financial statements.

                        In the given situation, a new proceeding was initiated against the company for holding a benami
                        property  worth  `  2.5  crores  during  the  financial  year.  However,  the  company's  legal  team  had
                        advised that the case would not withstand the law and would be dismissed during the hearing,
                        which would be held in April of the next financial year.

                        Therefore, the above observation of a new proceeding initiated against the company for holding a
                        benami property worth ` 2.5 crores need to be disclosed as per clause (i) (e) of para 3 of CARO
                        2020.

                    (ii)  As per clause (xvii) of para 3 of CARO 2020, the auditor shall include a statement on whether the
                        company has incurred cash losses in the financial year and in the immediately preceding financial
                        year, if so, state the amount of cash losses.

                        In  the  given  situation, the company  incurred  a  cash  loss  of  `  39  lakh  during the  financial year.
                        Hence, a cash loss of ` 39 lakh during the financial year need to be reported as per clause (xvii) of
                        para 3 of CARO 2020

        www.auditguru.in                                             PARAM                                                                      7.60 | P a g e
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225