Page 6 - 29. COMPILER QB - IND AS 10
P. 6

MTPs QUESTIONS

        Q5 (April 19)

        On 5th April, 20X2, fire damaged a consignment of inventory at one of the Jupiter’s Ltd.’s warehouse. This
        inventory had been manufactured prior to 31st March 20X2 costing Rs. 8 lakhs. The net realisable value of
        the inventory prior to the damage was estimated at Rs. 9.60 lakhs. Because of the damage caused to the
        consignment  of  inventory,  the  company  was  required  to  spend  an  additional  amount  of  Rs.  2  lakhs  on
        repairing and re-packaging of the inventory. The inventory was sold on 15th May, 20X2 for proceeds of Rs. 9

        lakhs.
        The accountant of Jupiter Ltd. treats this event as an adjusting event and adjusts this event of causing the
        damage to the inventory in its financial statement and accordingly re-measures the inventories as follows: Rs.
        Lakhs
                            Cost                                                       8.00
                            Net realisable value (9.6 -2)                               7.60
                            Inventories (lower of cost and net realisable value)        7.60

        Analyse  whether  the  above  accounting  treatment  made  by  the  accountant  in  regard  to  the  financial  year
        ending on 31.0.20X2 is in compliance with the Ind AS. If not, advise the correct treatment along with working
        for the same.

        SOLUTION
        The above treatment needs to be examined in the light of the provisions given in Ind AS 10 ‘Events after the
        Reporting Period’ and Ind AS 2 ‘Inventories’.
        Ind AS 10 ‘Events after the Reporting Period’ defines “Events after the reporting period are those events,
        favourable  and  unfavourable,  that  occur  between  the  end  of  the  reporting  period  and  the  date  when  the

        financial statements are approved by the Board of Directors in case of a company, and, by the corresponding
        approving authority in case of any other entity for issue. Two types of events can be identified:
         (a) those  that  provide  evidence  of  conditions  that  existed  at  the  end  of  the  reporting  period  (adjusting
             events after the reporting period); and

         (b) those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period (non-adjusting events after
             the reporting period).
        Further, paragraph 10 of Ind AS 10 states that:
        “An entity shall not adjust the amounts recognised in its financial statements to reflect non-adjusting events
        after the reporting period”.
        Further, Ind AS 2 defines:

        “Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs
        of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale”.
        Further, Ind AS 2 states that:
        “Inventories shall be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value”.
        Accountant  of  Jupiter  Ltd.  has  re-measured  the  inventories  after  adjusting  the  event  in  its  financial

        statement which is not correct and nor in accordance with provision of Ind AS 2 and Ind AS 10.
        Accordingly, the event causing the damage to the inventory occurred after the reporting date and as per the
        principles laid down under Ind AS 10 ‘Events After the Reporting Date’ is a non-adjusting event as it does not
        affect conditions at the reporting date. Non-adjusting events are not recognised in the financial statements,
        but are disclosed where their effect is material.
                                                                                                        29. 5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11