Page 18 - 19. COMPILER QB - INDAS 115
P. 18

price  of  the  discount  voucher  is  Rs.  120  (Rs.  500  average  purchase  price  of  additional  products  x  30%
        incremental discount x 80% likelihood of exercising the option). The stand-alone selling prices of Product A
        and the discount voucher and the resulting allocation of the Rs. 1,000 transaction price are as follows:


                                    Performance obligations    Stand-alone selling price
                                          Product A                    Rs. 1,000
                                       Discount voucher                Rs. 120
                                            Total                      Rs. 1,120

                          Performance                                    Allocated transaction price
                          obligations                                        (to nearest Rs.10)
                           Product A      (Rs. 1000 ÷ Rs. 1120 × Rs. 1000)        Rs. 890
                        Discount voucher   (Rs. 120 ÷ Rs. 1120 × Rs. 1000)         Rs. 110
                             Total                                                Rs. 1000


        The entity allocates Rs. 890 to Product A and recognises revenue for Product A when control transfers. The
        entity allocates Rs. 110 to the discount voucher and recognises revenue  for the voucher when the customer
        redeems it for goods or services or when it expires.


        Q16.  (MAY 20)
        ST Limited enters into a contract with a customer to sell an asset. Control of the asset will transfer to the
        customer  in  two  years  (i.e.  the  performance  obligation  will  be  satisfied  at  a  point  in  time).  The  contract

        includes two alternative payment options:
        (1)  Payment of Rs. 5,000 in two years when the customer obtains control of the asset or
        (2) Payment of Rs. 4,000 when the contract is signed.
        The customer elects to pay Rs. 4,000 when the contract is signed.

        ST Limited concludes that the contract contains a significant financing component because of the length of
        time between when the customer pays for the asset and when the entity transfers the asset to the customer,
        as well as the prevailing interest rates in the market.
        The interest rate implicit in the transaction is 11.8 per cent, which is the interest rate necessary to make the
        two alternative payment options economically equivalent. However, the entity  determines that the rate that
        should be used in adjusting the promised consideration is 6%, which is the entity's incremental borrowing rate.

        Pass journal entries showing how the entity would account for the significant financing component.
        SOLUTION

        Journal Entries showing accounting for the significant financing component:
        (a)  Recognise a contract liability for the Rs. 4,000 payment received at contract inception:
                       Cash                                 Dr.           Rs. 4,000
                              To Contract liability                                    Rs. 4,000
        (b) During  the  two  years  from  contract  inception  until  the  transfer  of  the  asset,  the  entity  adjusts  the

             promised amount of consideration and accretes the contract liability by recognising interest on Rs. 4,000
             at 6% for two years:
                       Interest expense                           Dr.           Rs. 494*

                                                                                                19. 17
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23