Page 9 - 34.2 FR MARCH 22 MTP ANSWER
P. 9

agreement between MIL and the doctors creating enforceable rights and obligations.
            The doctors to whom gifts are distributed are not ‘customers’ of MIL as they have not contracted with it
             to obtain goods or services in exchange for consideration.
            The items distributed as gifts are not an output of MIL ordinary activities.

        In view of the above, the distribution of gifts to doctors does not fall under the scope of Ind AS 115.
        As per Ind AS 38, sometimes expenditure is incurred to provide future economic benefits to an entity, but no
        intangible asset or other asset is acquired or created that can be recognised. In the case of the supply of
        goods, the entity recognises such expenditure as an expense when it has a right to access those goods.

        Examples  of  expenditure  that  is  recognised  as  an  expense  when  it  is  incurred  include  expenditure  on
        advertising and promotional activities (including mail order catalogues).
        Items  acquired  by  MIL  to  be  distributed  as  gifts  as  a  part  of  sales  promotion  acti  vities  have  no  other
        purpose than to undertake those activities. In other words, the only benefit of those items for MIL is to
        develop or create brands or customer relationships, which in turn generate revenue. Ind AS 38 requires an

        entity to recognise expenditure on such items as an expense when the entity has a right to access those
        goods. Ind AS 38 states that an entity has a right to access goods when it owns them, or otherwise has a
        right to access them regardless of when it distributes the goods.
        In view of the above, MIL should recognise the cost of the items to be distributed as gifts as an expense
        when it owns those items, or otherwise has a right to access them, regardless of when it distributes the
        items to doctors.

                                                           OR

                     Date           Particulars                                        (Rs.)    (Rs.)
                     15/3/20X1      Investment A/c                             Dr.    20,000
                                    Transaction Cost A/c                       Dr.      400
                                           To Bank                                             20,400
                     31/3/20X1      Investment A/c                             Dr.     4,000
                                           To Fair Value Gain A/c                               4,000
                     31/3/20X1      P&L A/c                                    Dr.      400
                                           To Transaction Cost A/c                               400
                     31/3/20X1      Fair Value Gain A/c                              Dr.   4,000
                                               To P&L A/c                                       4,000


        (c)  The carrying amount of the debenture on the date of transition under previous GAAP, assuming that all
             interest accrued other than premium on redemption have been paid, will be  Rs. 31,50,000 [(30,000 x
             100)  +  (30,000  x  100  x  10/100  x  2/4)].  The  premium  payable  on  redemption  is  being  recognised  as
             borrowing costs as per para 4(b) of AS 16 ie under previous GAAP on straight- line basis.
        As per para D18 of Ind AS 101, Ind AS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, requires an entity to split a

        compound  financial  instrument  at  inception  into  separate  liability  and  equity  components.  If  the  liability
        component  is  no  longer  outstanding,  retrospective  application  of  Ind  AS  32  would  involve  separating  two
        portions of equity. The first portion is recognised in retained earnings and represents the cumulative interest
        accreted on the liability component. The other portion represents the original equity component. However, in
        accordance  with  this  Ind  AS,  a  first-time  adopter  need  not  separate  these  two  portions  if  the  liability

        component is no longer outstanding at the date of transition to Ind AS.
        In the present case, since the liability is outstanding on the date of transition, S Ltd. will need to split the

                                                                                                       34.15
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14