Page 269 - CA Final PARAM Digital Book.
P. 269

v  Value of imports calculated on C.I.F. basis by the company during the financial year in respect of:
                                     a)  raw materials;
                                     b)  components and spare parts;
                                     c)  capital goods.

                       vi  Expenditure  in  foreign  currency  during  the  financial  year  on  account  of  royalty,  know-how,
                          professional and consultation fees, interest, and other matters.

                       vii  Value of all imported raw materials, spare parts and components consumed during the financial
                          year  and  the  value  of  all  indigenous  raw  materials,  spare  parts  and  components  similarly
                          consumed and the percentage of each to the total consumption.

                       viii  The amount remitted during the year in foreign currencies on account of dividends, with a specific
                          mention  of  the  number  of  non-resident  shareholders,  the  number  of  shares  held  by  them  on
                          which the dividends were due and the year to which the dividends related.

                       ix  Earnings in foreign exchange classified under the following heads, namely:
                                     a.  export of goods calculated on F.O.B. basis;
                                     b.  royalty, know-how, professional and consultation fees;
                                     c.  interest and dividend;
                                     d.  other income, indicating the nature thereof.

          QNO      (Losses in Subsidiary) AS 21-       Old Course – (M09R, M13E, M16M, SM17, PM17 SM21, M23M)
          444.000  Unique
                   K Ltd. had 5 subsidiaries as at 31st March 2015 and the investments in-subsidiaries are considered as
                   long term and valued at cost. Two of the subsidiaries net worth eroded as at 31st March 15 and the
                   prospects of their recovery are very bleak and the other three subsidiaries are doing exceptionally well.

                   The company did not provide for the decline in the value of investments in two subsidiaries because the
                   overall investment portfolio in subsidiaries did not suffer any decline' as the other three subsidiaries are

                   doing exceptionally well. Comment.
          Answer  Part I -- Relevant Standards & Laws
                       ▪  AS-13 - Accounting for Investments

                   Part II -- Requirements of Relevant Standards & law Consolidated
                       ➢  As per AS-13 “Accounting for Investments”  issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
                          India, long-term investments are usually of individual importance to the investing enterprise. The
                          carrying amount of long-term investments is therefore determined on an individual investment
                          basis.  Investments  classified  as  long-term  investments  should  be  carried  in  the  financial
                          statements at cost. However, provision for diminution shall be made to recognize a decline, other
                          than temporary, in the value of the investments, such reduction being determined and made for
                          each investment individually.
                   Part III – Case Discussion
                       ➢  K Ltd. had 5 subsidiaries as at 31st March 2015 and the investments in-subsidiaries are considered
                          as long term and valued at cost. Two of the subsidiaries net worth eroded as at 31st March 15 and
                          the  prospects  of  their  recovery  are  very  bleak  and  the  other  three  subsidiaries  are  doing
                          exceptionally well. The company did not provide for the decline in the value of investments in two
                          subsidiaries because the overall investment portfolio in subsidiaries did not suffer any decline' as
                          the other three subsidiaries are doing exceptionally well. Comment
                   Part IV – Conclusion
                       ➢  Keeping in view the above, K Ltd should provide for the decline in the value of investments in two
                          subsidiaries despite the fact that the overall investment portfolio in subsidiaries did not suffer any
                          decline.










          www.auditguru.in                                             PARAM                                                                   13.18 | P a g e
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274